Which of the follow...
 

Hello and welcome to Psychology Roots Forums! We are thrilled to have joined us in this space dedicated to all things related to psychology. Participating in forums can be a great way to learn from others, share your own experiences and knowledge, and connect with like-minded individuals. You can engage in discussions on topics ranging from the latest research in psychology to practical tips for improving mental health.

We also invite you to take advantage of the resources available on our website, including articles, videos, and recommended readings. With so much information at your fingertips, Psychology Roots Forums is the perfect place to begin or deepen your exploration of psychology.

Which of the following would be the best piece of evidence for the nativist theory of language acquisition?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
619 Views
(@aamir)
Posts: 2889
Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Which of the following would be the best piece of evidence for the nativist theory of language acquisition?

(A) a child who acquires language at an extremely early age through intense instruction by her or his parents
(B) statistical evidence that children in one culture learn language faster than children in another culture
(C) a child of normal mental ability not being able to learn language due to language deprivation at an early age
(D) a child skipping the babbling and telegraphic speech stages of language acquisition
(E) a child deprived of language at an early age successfully learning language later

Spoiler
Answer
(C) a child of normal mental ability not being able to learn language due to language deprivation at an early age

Spoiler
Explanation
The critical-period hypothesis states that children need to learn language during a certain developmental period or their language may be permanently retarded. A child learning language early due to parental instruction is better evidence for the behaviorist view of language acquisition. Language-learning rates between cultures or skipping stages are irrelevant to the critical-period hypothesis. A child deprived of language early on who successfully learns language later would be evidence against the critical-period hypothesis.


 
Posted : 20/02/2024 2:31 pm
Share: